gcc: fix 4.2.4 ICE on avr32 (see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34762)
SVN-Revision: 15434master
parent
a296bdb983
commit
128b623ec8
@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ |
||||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34762
|
||||
|
||||
--- a/gcc/reload.c
|
||||
+++ b/gcc/reload.c
|
||||
@@ -4789,7 +4789,7 @@ find_reloads_address (enum machine_mode
|
||||
find_reloads_address (GET_MODE (tem), &tem, XEXP (tem, 0),
|
||||
&XEXP (tem, 0), opnum,
|
||||
ADDR_TYPE (type), ind_levels, insn);
|
||||
- if (tem != orig)
|
||||
+ if (!rtx_equal_p (tem, orig))
|
||||
push_reg_equiv_alt_mem (regno, tem);
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* We can avoid a reload if the register's equivalent memory
|
||||
@@ -5589,7 +5589,7 @@ find_reloads_address_1 (enum machine_mod
|
||||
RELOAD_OTHER,
|
||||
ind_levels, insn);
|
||||
|
||||
- if (tem != orig)
|
||||
+ if (!rtx_equal_p (tem, orig))
|
||||
push_reg_equiv_alt_mem (regno, tem);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Then reload the memory location into a base
|
||||
@@ -5656,7 +5656,7 @@ find_reloads_address_1 (enum machine_mod
|
||||
find_reloads_address (GET_MODE (tem), &tem, XEXP (tem, 0),
|
||||
&XEXP (tem, 0), opnum, type,
|
||||
ind_levels, insn);
|
||||
- if (tem != orig)
|
||||
+ if (!rtx_equal_p (tem, orig))
|
||||
push_reg_equiv_alt_mem (regno, tem);
|
||||
/* Put this inside a new increment-expression. */
|
||||
x = gen_rtx_fmt_e (GET_CODE (x), GET_MODE (x), tem);
|
||||
@@ -5848,7 +5848,7 @@ find_reloads_address_1 (enum machine_mod
|
||||
find_reloads_address (GET_MODE (x), &x, XEXP (x, 0),
|
||||
&XEXP (x, 0), opnum, ADDR_TYPE (type),
|
||||
ind_levels, insn);
|
||||
- if (x != tem)
|
||||
+ if (!rtx_equal_p (x, tem))
|
||||
push_reg_equiv_alt_mem (regno, x);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -6076,7 +6076,7 @@ find_reloads_subreg_address (rtx x, int
|
||||
XEXP (tem, 0), &XEXP (tem, 0),
|
||||
opnum, type, ind_levels, insn);
|
||||
/* ??? Do we need to handle nonzero offsets somehow? */
|
||||
- if (!offset && tem != orig)
|
||||
+ if (!offset && !rtx_equal_p (tem, orig))
|
||||
push_reg_equiv_alt_mem (regno, tem);
|
||||
|
||||
/* For some processors an address may be valid in the
|
Loading…
Reference in new issue