Specifically, this fixes status length calculation to be same as JS side.
BTW, since this pattern used in not only preview card fetching, we
should extract it (with twitter-regex?) and write tests I think.
* Clean up reblog-tracking sets from FeedManager
Builds on #5419, with a few minor optimizations and cleanup of sets
after they are no longer needed.
* Update tests, fix multiply-reblogged case
Previously, we would have lost the fact that a given status was
reblogged if the displayed reblog of it was removed, now we don't.
Also added tests to make sure FeedManager#trim cleans up our reblog
tracking keys, fixed up FeedCleanupScheduler to use the right loop,
and fixed the test for it.
* Swedish file added
* Swedish file added
* Swedish file updated
* Swedish languagefile added
* Add Swedish translation
* Add Swedish translation
* Started the Swedish translation
* Added Swedish lang settings
* Updating Swedish language
* Updating Swedish language
* Updating Swedish language
* Updating Swedish language
* Updating Swedish language
* Updating Swedish language
* Swedish language completed and added
* Swedish language Simple_form added
* Swedish language Divise added
* Swedish language doorkeeper added
* Swedish language - now all file complete
* Keep references to all reblogs of a status on home feed
When inserting reblog: Add to set of reblogs of this status on
the feed, if original status was present in the feed, add it to
that set as well.
When removing a reblog: Remove it from that set. Take random
remaining item from the set. If one exists, re-insert it into feed,
otherwise do not re-insert anything.
Fix#4210
* When original is removed, toss out reblog references
Fix#5398
Ordering the home timeline query by account_id meant that the first
100 items belonged to a single account. There was also no reason to
reverse-iterate over the statuses. Assuming the user accesses the
feed halfway-through, it's better to have recent statuses already
available at the top. Therefore working from newer->older is ideal.
If the algorithm ends up filtering all items out during last-mile
filtering, repeat again a page further. The algorithm terminates
when either at least one item has been added, or if the database
query returns nothing (end of data reached)
We've changed un-reblogging behavior when we implement Snowflake, to insert un-reblogged status at the position reblogging status existed.
However, our API expects home timeline is ordered by status ids, and max_id/since_id filters by zset score. Due to this, un-reblogged status appears as a last item of result set, and timeline expansion may skips many statuses.
So this reverts that change...reblogged status inserted at corresponding position to its id.
* Add option to reduce motion
* Use HOC to wrap all Motion calls
* fix case-sensitive issue
* Avoid updating too frequently
* Get rid of unnecessary change to _simple_status.html.haml
The main change of this PR is removing `order by visibility` hack.
This was introduced to force using of `index_statuses_on_account_id` instead of PK index, but it seems no longer needed probably due to `index_statuses_on_account_id_id`. Removing this avoids reading all rows, so really improves first fetching of the user who has lot of statuses.
I have also changed JOIN to IN + subquery, which slightly faster in most cases.
- For some reason, :if option on before_action did not work. It got
executed every time, returned false, and the action run anyway,
which led to the current_sign_in_at and sign_in_count being
updated on every request
- Return "do not filter" early in FeedManager#filter_from_home? if
the status is authored by receiver. Usually this method is not
called for own statuses at all, but it is called when Feed#get
uses the database
- Return early if #reload_stale_associations! has nothing to load
to save a database query with WHERE 1=0
Do NOT send "delete" through streaming API when unmerging from
home timeline. "delete" implies that the original status was
deleted, which is not true!
Remote ActivityPub users that have never been known as OStatus users
(whether or not they support it) will not have a “remote_url” attribute
set. In case they reside on an instance with WEB_DOMAIN ≠ LOCAL_DOMAIN,
the current check did rely on “remote_url” to verify the user's domain.
Eugen Rochko