- Instrumentation for locks.
- Detailed test coverage.
- Adding RPC control handler to fetch lock instrumentation.
- RPC control handlers suite tests with a test RPC server.
This change initializes rpc servers associated with disks that are
local. It makes object layer initialization on demand, namely on the
first request to the object layer.
Also adds lock RPC service vendorized minio/dsync
This API is precursor before implementing `minio lambda` and `mc` continous replication.
This new api is an extention to BucketNofication APIs.
// Request
```
GET /bucket?notificationARN=arn:minio:lambda:us-east-1:10:minio HTTP/1.1
...
...
```
// Response
```
{"Records": ...}
...
...
...
{"Records": ...}
```
In current master ListObjectsV2 was merged into ListObjectsHandler
which also implements V1 API as well.
Move the detection of ListObject types to its rightful place
in http router.
By default server heals/creates missing directories and re-populates
`format.json`, in some scenarios when disk is down for maintainenance
it would be beneficial for users to ignore such disks rather than
mistakenly using `root` partition.
Fixes#2128
Previously newTestRequest() creates request object and returns
signature v4 signed request. In TestCopyObject(), its required to add
headers later to the request and sign the request.
This patch introduces two new functions
* signRequest(): signs request using given access/secret keys.
* newTestSignedRequest(): returns new request object signed with given
access/secret keys.
Fixes#2097
This patch fixes majority of discrepant messages and responses
previously reported.
There are few discrepancies observed
- S3 is not honoring 'If-Modified-Since' header.
- We do not implement object policy, S3 returns a different response in this category.
- Adding new headers causes signature mismatch, but Minio server is fine for example
TestCopyObject() to be fixed by moving the signature logic out.
Relevant bug - https://github.com/minio/minio/issues/2097Fixes#1955
PR contains,
- New setup utilities for running object handler tests. Here is why they are essential,
- Unit tests have to be run in isolation without being have to be associated with other functionalities which are not under test.
- The integration tests follows the philosophy of running a Test Server and registers all handlers and fires HTTP requests over the socket to simulate the system functionality under usual work load scenarios and test for correctness. But this philosophy cannot be adopted for running unit tests for HTTP handlers.
- Running Unit tests for API handlers,
- Shouldn't run a test server. Should purely call the handlers `ServeHTTP` under isolation.
- Shouldn't register all handlers, should only register handlers under test and so that the system is close to be in an isolated setup.
- As an example PutBucketPolicy test is illustrated using the new setup. Exhaustive cases has to be added and has been listen in TODO for now.
* Added unit-tests for treeWalkPool
* Added unit tests for tree-walk-fs
* Added period at the end of all comments.
* FS/XL: Unified tree walk tests for both backends
* Added disk failure related tests for treewalk
Replaced removeRandomDisks with removeDiskN. There is no need to
randomize disks that fail while the distribution of chunks in XL during
erasure coding data is random.
Fixes#1636
New format now generates a UUID and includes it along with
the order of disks. So that UUID is the real order of disks
and on command line user is able to specify disks in any order.
This pre-dominantly solves our dilemma.
```
{
"format" : "xl",
"xl" : {
"version" : "1",
"disk": "00e4cf06-5bf5-4bb5-b885-4b2fff4a7959",
"jbod" : [
"00e4cf06-5bf5-4bb5-b885-4b2fff4a7959",
....
"c47d2608-5067-4ed7-b1e4-fb81bdbb549f",
"a543293e-99f1-4310-b540-1e450878e844",
"18f97cbe-529a-456a-b6d4-0feacf64534d"
]
},
"version" : "1"
}
```
Karthic Rao