oyd
/
minio
6
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
1949 Commits
1 Branch
0 Tags
89 MiB
Tag: Branch: Tree: bae43ccbc7
Branches Tags
${ item.name }
Create tag ${ searchTerm }
Create branch ${ searchTerm }
from 'bae43ccbc7'
${ noResults }
minio/vendor.json

90 lines
2.7 KiB
Raw Normal View History Unescape

Migrate to govendor to avoid limitations of godep - over the course of a project history every maintainer needs to update its dependency packages, the problem essentially with godep is manipulating GOPATH - this manipulation leads to static objects created at different locations which end up conflicting with the overall functionality of golang. This also leads to broken builds. There is no easier way out of this other than asking developers to do 'godep restore' all the time. Which perhaps as a practice doesn't sound like a clean solution. On the other hand 'godep restore' has its own set of problems. - govendor is a right tool but a stop gap tool until we wait for golangs official 1.5 version which fixes this vendoring issue once and for all. - govendor provides consistency in terms of how import paths should be handled unlike manipulation GOPATH. This has advantages - no more compiled objects being referenced in GOPATH and build time GOPATH manging which leads to conflicts. - proper import paths referencing the exact package a project is dependent on. govendor is simple and provides the minimal necessary tooling to achieve this. For now this is the right solution.
9 years ago
{
"comment": "",
Migrate to golang1.5 release with GO15VENDOREXPERIMENT=1 enabled
9 years ago
"ignore": "",
Migrate to govendor to avoid limitations of godep - over the course of a project history every maintainer needs to update its dependency packages, the problem essentially with godep is manipulating GOPATH - this manipulation leads to static objects created at different locations which end up conflicting with the overall functionality of golang. This also leads to broken builds. There is no easier way out of this other than asking developers to do 'godep restore' all the time. Which perhaps as a practice doesn't sound like a clean solution. On the other hand 'godep restore' has its own set of problems. - govendor is a right tool but a stop gap tool until we wait for golangs official 1.5 version which fixes this vendoring issue once and for all. - govendor provides consistency in terms of how import paths should be handled unlike manipulation GOPATH. This has advantages - no more compiled objects being referenced in GOPATH and build time GOPATH manging which leads to conflicts. - proper import paths referencing the exact package a project is dependent on. govendor is simple and provides the minimal necessary tooling to achieve this. For now this is the right solution.
9 years ago
"package": [
{
"canonical": "github.com/dustin/go-humanize",
"comment": "",
Migrate to golang1.5 release with GO15VENDOREXPERIMENT=1 enabled
9 years ago
"local": "vendor/github.com/dustin/go-humanize",
Migrate to govendor to avoid limitations of godep - over the course of a project history every maintainer needs to update its dependency packages, the problem essentially with godep is manipulating GOPATH - this manipulation leads to static objects created at different locations which end up conflicting with the overall functionality of golang. This also leads to broken builds. There is no easier way out of this other than asking developers to do 'godep restore' all the time. Which perhaps as a practice doesn't sound like a clean solution. On the other hand 'godep restore' has its own set of problems. - govendor is a right tool but a stop gap tool until we wait for golangs official 1.5 version which fixes this vendoring issue once and for all. - govendor provides consistency in terms of how import paths should be handled unlike manipulation GOPATH. This has advantages - no more compiled objects being referenced in GOPATH and build time GOPATH manging which leads to conflicts. - proper import paths referencing the exact package a project is dependent on. govendor is simple and provides the minimal necessary tooling to achieve this. For now this is the right solution.
9 years ago
"revision": "1c212aae1d02984808182b98b0da7a3e07e4c770",
"revisionTime": "2015-08-09T13:14:05-07:00"
},
{
"canonical": "github.com/facebookgo/clock",
"comment": "",
Migrate to golang1.5 release with GO15VENDOREXPERIMENT=1 enabled
9 years ago
"local": "vendor/github.com/facebookgo/clock",
Migrate to govendor to avoid limitations of godep - over the course of a project history every maintainer needs to update its dependency packages, the problem essentially with godep is manipulating GOPATH - this manipulation leads to static objects created at different locations which end up conflicting with the overall functionality of golang. This also leads to broken builds. There is no easier way out of this other than asking developers to do 'godep restore' all the time. Which perhaps as a practice doesn't sound like a clean solution. On the other hand 'godep restore' has its own set of problems. - govendor is a right tool but a stop gap tool until we wait for golangs official 1.5 version which fixes this vendoring issue once and for all. - govendor provides consistency in terms of how import paths should be handled unlike manipulation GOPATH. This has advantages - no more compiled objects being referenced in GOPATH and build time GOPATH manging which leads to conflicts. - proper import paths referencing the exact package a project is dependent on. govendor is simple and provides the minimal necessary tooling to achieve this. For now this is the right solution.
9 years ago
"revision": "600d898af40aa09a7a93ecb9265d87b0504b6f03",
"revisionTime": "2015-04-09T18:09:13-07:00"
},
{
"canonical": "github.com/facebookgo/httpdown",
"comment": "",
Migrate to golang1.5 release with GO15VENDOREXPERIMENT=1 enabled
9 years ago
"local": "vendor/github.com/facebookgo/httpdown",
Migrate to govendor to avoid limitations of godep - over the course of a project history every maintainer needs to update its dependency packages, the problem essentially with godep is manipulating GOPATH - this manipulation leads to static objects created at different locations which end up conflicting with the overall functionality of golang. This also leads to broken builds. There is no easier way out of this other than asking developers to do 'godep restore' all the time. Which perhaps as a practice doesn't sound like a clean solution. On the other hand 'godep restore' has its own set of problems. - govendor is a right tool but a stop gap tool until we wait for golangs official 1.5 version which fixes this vendoring issue once and for all. - govendor provides consistency in terms of how import paths should be handled unlike manipulation GOPATH. This has advantages - no more compiled objects being referenced in GOPATH and build time GOPATH manging which leads to conflicts. - proper import paths referencing the exact package a project is dependent on. govendor is simple and provides the minimal necessary tooling to achieve this. For now this is the right solution.
9 years ago
"revision": "9229879964ff32fc4e42c7ba6b4745efce39023c",
"revisionTime": "2015-08-07T22:21:07Z"
},
{
"canonical": "github.com/facebookgo/stats",
"comment": "",
Migrate to golang1.5 release with GO15VENDOREXPERIMENT=1 enabled
9 years ago
"local": "vendor/github.com/facebookgo/stats",
Migrate to govendor to avoid limitations of godep - over the course of a project history every maintainer needs to update its dependency packages, the problem essentially with godep is manipulating GOPATH - this manipulation leads to static objects created at different locations which end up conflicting with the overall functionality of golang. This also leads to broken builds. There is no easier way out of this other than asking developers to do 'godep restore' all the time. Which perhaps as a practice doesn't sound like a clean solution. On the other hand 'godep restore' has its own set of problems. - govendor is a right tool but a stop gap tool until we wait for golangs official 1.5 version which fixes this vendoring issue once and for all. - govendor provides consistency in terms of how import paths should be handled unlike manipulation GOPATH. This has advantages - no more compiled objects being referenced in GOPATH and build time GOPATH manging which leads to conflicts. - proper import paths referencing the exact package a project is dependent on. govendor is simple and provides the minimal necessary tooling to achieve this. For now this is the right solution.
9 years ago
"revision": "31fb71caf5a4f04c9f8bb3fa8e7c2597ba6eb50a",
"revisionTime": "2015-06-12T18:29:15Z"
},
{
"canonical": "github.com/fatih/structs",
"comment": "",
Migrate to golang1.5 release with GO15VENDOREXPERIMENT=1 enabled
9 years ago
"local": "vendor/github.com/fatih/structs",
Migrate to govendor to avoid limitations of godep - over the course of a project history every maintainer needs to update its dependency packages, the problem essentially with godep is manipulating GOPATH - this manipulation leads to static objects created at different locations which end up conflicting with the overall functionality of golang. This also leads to broken builds. There is no easier way out of this other than asking developers to do 'godep restore' all the time. Which perhaps as a practice doesn't sound like a clean solution. On the other hand 'godep restore' has its own set of problems. - govendor is a right tool but a stop gap tool until we wait for golangs official 1.5 version which fixes this vendoring issue once and for all. - govendor provides consistency in terms of how import paths should be handled unlike manipulation GOPATH. This has advantages - no more compiled objects being referenced in GOPATH and build time GOPATH manging which leads to conflicts. - proper import paths referencing the exact package a project is dependent on. govendor is simple and provides the minimal necessary tooling to achieve this. For now this is the right solution.
9 years ago
"revision": "a9f7daa9c2729e97450c2da2feda19130a367d8f",
"revisionTime": "2015-05-26T09:43:52+03:00"
},
{
"canonical": "github.com/gorilla/context",
"comment": "",
Migrate to golang1.5 release with GO15VENDOREXPERIMENT=1 enabled
9 years ago
"local": "vendor/github.com/gorilla/context",
Migrate to govendor to avoid limitations of godep - over the course of a project history every maintainer needs to update its dependency packages, the problem essentially with godep is manipulating GOPATH - this manipulation leads to static objects created at different locations which end up conflicting with the overall functionality of golang. This also leads to broken builds. There is no easier way out of this other than asking developers to do 'godep restore' all the time. Which perhaps as a practice doesn't sound like a clean solution. On the other hand 'godep restore' has its own set of problems. - govendor is a right tool but a stop gap tool until we wait for golangs official 1.5 version which fixes this vendoring issue once and for all. - govendor provides consistency in terms of how import paths should be handled unlike manipulation GOPATH. This has advantages - no more compiled objects being referenced in GOPATH and build time GOPATH manging which leads to conflicts. - proper import paths referencing the exact package a project is dependent on. govendor is simple and provides the minimal necessary tooling to achieve this. For now this is the right solution.
9 years ago
"revision": "215affda49addc4c8ef7e2534915df2c8c35c6cd",
"revisionTime": "2014-12-17T08:02:51-08:00"
},
{
"canonical": "github.com/gorilla/mux",
"comment": "",
Migrate to golang1.5 release with GO15VENDOREXPERIMENT=1 enabled
9 years ago
"local": "vendor/github.com/gorilla/mux",
Migrate to govendor to avoid limitations of godep - over the course of a project history every maintainer needs to update its dependency packages, the problem essentially with godep is manipulating GOPATH - this manipulation leads to static objects created at different locations which end up conflicting with the overall functionality of golang. This also leads to broken builds. There is no easier way out of this other than asking developers to do 'godep restore' all the time. Which perhaps as a practice doesn't sound like a clean solution. On the other hand 'godep restore' has its own set of problems. - govendor is a right tool but a stop gap tool until we wait for golangs official 1.5 version which fixes this vendoring issue once and for all. - govendor provides consistency in terms of how import paths should be handled unlike manipulation GOPATH. This has advantages - no more compiled objects being referenced in GOPATH and build time GOPATH manging which leads to conflicts. - proper import paths referencing the exact package a project is dependent on. govendor is simple and provides the minimal necessary tooling to achieve this. For now this is the right solution.
9 years ago
"revision": "5112c33f3a6ef694c1e5784b68981f08b3f0327c",
"revisionTime": "2015-08-11T22:16:22-07:00"
},
{
"canonical": "github.com/gorilla/rpc/v2",
"comment": "",
Migrate to golang1.5 release with GO15VENDOREXPERIMENT=1 enabled
9 years ago
"local": "vendor/github.com/gorilla/rpc/v2",
Migrate to govendor to avoid limitations of godep - over the course of a project history every maintainer needs to update its dependency packages, the problem essentially with godep is manipulating GOPATH - this manipulation leads to static objects created at different locations which end up conflicting with the overall functionality of golang. This also leads to broken builds. There is no easier way out of this other than asking developers to do 'godep restore' all the time. Which perhaps as a practice doesn't sound like a clean solution. On the other hand 'godep restore' has its own set of problems. - govendor is a right tool but a stop gap tool until we wait for golangs official 1.5 version which fixes this vendoring issue once and for all. - govendor provides consistency in terms of how import paths should be handled unlike manipulation GOPATH. This has advantages - no more compiled objects being referenced in GOPATH and build time GOPATH manging which leads to conflicts. - proper import paths referencing the exact package a project is dependent on. govendor is simple and provides the minimal necessary tooling to achieve this. For now this is the right solution.
9 years ago
"revision": "74aa4b5cceca1188df2c7128f7ede4c92893701e",
"revisionTime": "2015-08-09T21:43:58-07:00"
},
{
"canonical": "github.com/gorilla/rpc/v2/json",
"comment": "",
Migrate to golang1.5 release with GO15VENDOREXPERIMENT=1 enabled
9 years ago
"local": "vendor/github.com/gorilla/rpc/v2/json",
Migrate to govendor to avoid limitations of godep - over the course of a project history every maintainer needs to update its dependency packages, the problem essentially with godep is manipulating GOPATH - this manipulation leads to static objects created at different locations which end up conflicting with the overall functionality of golang. This also leads to broken builds. There is no easier way out of this other than asking developers to do 'godep restore' all the time. Which perhaps as a practice doesn't sound like a clean solution. On the other hand 'godep restore' has its own set of problems. - govendor is a right tool but a stop gap tool until we wait for golangs official 1.5 version which fixes this vendoring issue once and for all. - govendor provides consistency in terms of how import paths should be handled unlike manipulation GOPATH. This has advantages - no more compiled objects being referenced in GOPATH and build time GOPATH manging which leads to conflicts. - proper import paths referencing the exact package a project is dependent on. govendor is simple and provides the minimal necessary tooling to achieve this. For now this is the right solution.
9 years ago
"revision": "74aa4b5cceca1188df2c7128f7ede4c92893701e",
"revisionTime": "2015-08-09T21:43:58-07:00"
},
{
"canonical": "github.com/minio/cli",
"comment": "",
Migrate to golang1.5 release with GO15VENDOREXPERIMENT=1 enabled
9 years ago
"local": "vendor/github.com/minio/cli",
"revision": "ee386baecc113eef2b8945df429120a5aec319ef",
"revisionTime": "2015-08-19T11:23:55-07:00"
Migrate to govendor to avoid limitations of godep - over the course of a project history every maintainer needs to update its dependency packages, the problem essentially with godep is manipulating GOPATH - this manipulation leads to static objects created at different locations which end up conflicting with the overall functionality of golang. This also leads to broken builds. There is no easier way out of this other than asking developers to do 'godep restore' all the time. Which perhaps as a practice doesn't sound like a clean solution. On the other hand 'godep restore' has its own set of problems. - govendor is a right tool but a stop gap tool until we wait for golangs official 1.5 version which fixes this vendoring issue once and for all. - govendor provides consistency in terms of how import paths should be handled unlike manipulation GOPATH. This has advantages - no more compiled objects being referenced in GOPATH and build time GOPATH manging which leads to conflicts. - proper import paths referencing the exact package a project is dependent on. govendor is simple and provides the minimal necessary tooling to achieve this. For now this is the right solution.
9 years ago
},
Enable controller to have CORS
9 years ago
{
"canonical": "github.com/rs/cors",
"comment": "",
"local": "vendor/github.com/rs/cors",
"revision": "eb527c8097e0f19a3ff7b253a3fe70545070f420",
"revisionTime": "2015-08-29T22:34:20-07:00"
},
Migrate to govendor to avoid limitations of godep - over the course of a project history every maintainer needs to update its dependency packages, the problem essentially with godep is manipulating GOPATH - this manipulation leads to static objects created at different locations which end up conflicting with the overall functionality of golang. This also leads to broken builds. There is no easier way out of this other than asking developers to do 'godep restore' all the time. Which perhaps as a practice doesn't sound like a clean solution. On the other hand 'godep restore' has its own set of problems. - govendor is a right tool but a stop gap tool until we wait for golangs official 1.5 version which fixes this vendoring issue once and for all. - govendor provides consistency in terms of how import paths should be handled unlike manipulation GOPATH. This has advantages - no more compiled objects being referenced in GOPATH and build time GOPATH manging which leads to conflicts. - proper import paths referencing the exact package a project is dependent on. govendor is simple and provides the minimal necessary tooling to achieve this. For now this is the right solution.
9 years ago
{
"canonical": "gopkg.in/check.v1",
"comment": "",
Migrate to golang1.5 release with GO15VENDOREXPERIMENT=1 enabled
9 years ago
"local": "vendor/gopkg.in/check.v1",
Migrate to govendor to avoid limitations of godep - over the course of a project history every maintainer needs to update its dependency packages, the problem essentially with godep is manipulating GOPATH - this manipulation leads to static objects created at different locations which end up conflicting with the overall functionality of golang. This also leads to broken builds. There is no easier way out of this other than asking developers to do 'godep restore' all the time. Which perhaps as a practice doesn't sound like a clean solution. On the other hand 'godep restore' has its own set of problems. - govendor is a right tool but a stop gap tool until we wait for golangs official 1.5 version which fixes this vendoring issue once and for all. - govendor provides consistency in terms of how import paths should be handled unlike manipulation GOPATH. This has advantages - no more compiled objects being referenced in GOPATH and build time GOPATH manging which leads to conflicts. - proper import paths referencing the exact package a project is dependent on. govendor is simple and provides the minimal necessary tooling to achieve this. For now this is the right solution.
9 years ago
"revision": "11d3bc7aa68e238947792f30573146a3231fc0f1",
"revisionTime": "2015-07-29T10:04:31+02:00"
}
]
}