|
|
|
|
介绍 [](https://slack.min.io)
|
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
该特性可以让多个Minio实例使用一个共享的NAS存储，而且不需要做什么特殊的设置。文件默认已经做了同步以及加锁。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
目的
|
|
|
|
|
----------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
由于Minio的设计理念是为单租户场景服务，所以用户希望采用在一个存储后端上运行多个Minio实例，这个存储后端可能是一个已有的NAS。Minio支持这种共享存储后端的特性，而且不需要用户做额外的设置。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
限制
|
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 如果正在执行GetObject()，则PutObject()会阻塞并等待。
|
|
|
|
|
* 如果正在执行PutObject()或者GetObject()，则CompleteMultipartUpload()会阻塞并等待。
|
|
|
|
|
* 无法
|
|
|
|
|
* A CompleteMultipartUpload() is blocked and waits if another PutObject() or GetObject() is in progress.
|
|
|
|
|
* 无法运行FS模式作为remote disk RPC。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## 如何运行?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
运行共享存储后端的Minio和直接运行在一块独立磁盘的Minio没有啥区别，不需要做额外设置来开启这个特性。访问NAS上的文件默认就会加锁和同步。以下示例将对您选择的每个操作系统上的操作进行阐述：
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
示例1: 运行Minio实例在持载在`/path/to/nfs-volume`路径下的共享后端存储。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On linux server1
|
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
|
|
|
minio server /path/to/nfs-volume
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On linux server2
|
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
|
|
|
minio server /path/to/nfs-volume
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Windows 2012 Server
|
|
|
|
|
|
fix: use buffers only when necessary for io.Copy() (#11229)
Use separate sync.Pool for writes/reads
Avoid passing buffers for io.CopyBuffer()
if the writer or reader implement io.WriteTo or io.ReadFrom
respectively then its useless for sync.Pool to allocate
buffers on its own since that will be completely ignored
by the io.CopyBuffer Go implementation.
Improve this wherever we see this to be optimal.
This allows us to be more efficient on memory usage.
```
385 // copyBuffer is the actual implementation of Copy and CopyBuffer.
386 // if buf is nil, one is allocated.
387 func copyBuffer(dst Writer, src Reader, buf []byte) (written int64, err error) {
388 // If the reader has a WriteTo method, use it to do the copy.
389 // Avoids an allocation and a copy.
390 if wt, ok := src.(WriterTo); ok {
391 return wt.WriteTo(dst)
392 }
393 // Similarly, if the writer has a ReadFrom method, use it to do the copy.
394 if rt, ok := dst.(ReaderFrom); ok {
395 return rt.ReadFrom(src)
396 }
```
From readahead package
```
// WriteTo writes data to w until there's no more data to write or when an error occurs.
// The return value n is the number of bytes written.
// Any error encountered during the write is also returned.
func (a *reader) WriteTo(w io.Writer) (n int64, err error) {
if a.err != nil {
return 0, a.err
}
n = 0
for {
err = a.fill()
if err != nil {
return n, err
}
n2, err := w.Write(a.cur.buffer())
a.cur.inc(n2)
n += int64(n2)
if err != nil {
return n, err
}
```
4 years ago
|
|
|
示例1: 运行Minio实例在持载在`\\remote-server\cifs`路径下的共享后端存储。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On windows server1
|
|
|
|
|
```cmd
|
|
|
|
|
minio.exe server \\remote-server\cifs\data
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On windows server2
|
|
|
|
|
```cmd
|
|
|
|
|
minio.exe server \\remote-server\cifs\data
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
或者共享存储挂载在`D:\`盘.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On windows server1
|
|
|
|
|
```cmd
|
|
|
|
|
minio.exe server D:\data
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On windows server2
|
|
|
|
|
```cmd
|
|
|
|
|
minio.exe server D:\data
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
架构
|
|
|
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## POSIX/Win32 Locks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Lock process
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
在同一个Minio实例中，lock由现有的内存命名空间锁（** sync.RWMutex **等）处理。 为了在许多Minio实例之间同步锁，我们利用Unix上的POSIX`fcntl（）`锁定和Windows`LockFileEx（）`Win32 API）。 如果相邻Minio实例在同一路径上有任何读锁，则写锁请求会被阻塞。 如果有正在进行的写锁，读锁也是如此。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Unlock process
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
关闭文件描述符（fd）就会将之前获得的锁释放。关闭fd将告诉内核放弃当前进程在路径上保留的所有锁。当相同进程在同一路径上有多个读操作时，这会变得更加棘手，这意味着关闭一个fd也会为所有并发读释放锁。 为了正确地处理这种情况，实现了简单的fd引用计数，多个读操作之间共享相同的fd。 当读操作开始关闭fd时，我们开始减少引用计数，一旦引用计数达到零，我们可以确保没有更多的活跃读操作。 所以我们继续关闭底层文件描述符，这将放弃在路径上保留的读锁。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
这个不适用于写操作，因为对于每个对象总是有一个写和多个读。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## 处理并发。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
这里的一个例子显示了如何使用GetObject()处理争用。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GetObject()持有`fs.json`的一个读锁。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```go
|
|
|
|
|
fsMetaPath := pathJoin(fs.fsPath, minioMetaBucket, bucketMetaPrefix, bucket, object, fsMetaJSONFile)
|
|
|
|
|
rlk, err := fs.rwPool.Open(fsMetaPath)
|
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
|
return toObjectErr(err, bucket, object)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
defer rlk.Close()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
... you can perform other operations here ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
fix: use buffers only when necessary for io.Copy() (#11229)
Use separate sync.Pool for writes/reads
Avoid passing buffers for io.CopyBuffer()
if the writer or reader implement io.WriteTo or io.ReadFrom
respectively then its useless for sync.Pool to allocate
buffers on its own since that will be completely ignored
by the io.CopyBuffer Go implementation.
Improve this wherever we see this to be optimal.
This allows us to be more efficient on memory usage.
```
385 // copyBuffer is the actual implementation of Copy and CopyBuffer.
386 // if buf is nil, one is allocated.
387 func copyBuffer(dst Writer, src Reader, buf []byte) (written int64, err error) {
388 // If the reader has a WriteTo method, use it to do the copy.
389 // Avoids an allocation and a copy.
390 if wt, ok := src.(WriterTo); ok {
391 return wt.WriteTo(dst)
392 }
393 // Similarly, if the writer has a ReadFrom method, use it to do the copy.
394 if rt, ok := dst.(ReaderFrom); ok {
395 return rt.ReadFrom(src)
396 }
```
From readahead package
```
// WriteTo writes data to w until there's no more data to write or when an error occurs.
// The return value n is the number of bytes written.
// Any error encountered during the write is also returned.
func (a *reader) WriteTo(w io.Writer) (n int64, err error) {
if a.err != nil {
return 0, a.err
}
n = 0
for {
err = a.fill()
if err != nil {
return n, err
}
n2, err := w.Write(a.cur.buffer())
a.cur.inc(n2)
n += int64(n2)
if err != nil {
return n, err
}
```
4 years ago
|
|
|
_, err = io.Copy(writer, reader)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
... after successful copy operation unlocks the read lock ...
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
对同一个对象的并发PutObject操作
|
|
|
|
|
在同一个对象上请求一个并发的PutObject, PutObject()尝试获取一个`fs.json`上的写锁。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```go
|
|
|
|
|
fsMetaPath := pathJoin(fs.fsPath, minioMetaBucket, bucketMetaPrefix, bucket, object, fsMetaJSONFile)
|
|
|
|
|
wlk, err := fs.rwPool.Create(fsMetaPath)
|
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
|
return ObjectInfo{}, toObjectErr(err, bucket, object)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
// This close will allow for locks to be synchronized on `fs.json`.
|
|
|
|
|
defer wlk.Close()
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
现在从上面的代码片段可以看到，直到GetObject()返回。 以下部分代码将被阻塞。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```go
|
|
|
|
|
wlk, err := fs.rwPool.Create(fsMetaPath)
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
这咱限制是必须的，以避免给客户端返回损坏的数据。反之亦然，PutObject(),GetObject()也会等待PutObject()完成之后再执行。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 警告 (并发)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
假设有3个Minio服务共享一个存储后端
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
minio1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- DeleteObject(object1) --> 在object1删除操作时持有`fs.json`的锁。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
minio2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- PutObject(object1) --> 等DeleteObject完毕后进行锁定。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
minio3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- PutObject(object1) --> (concurrent request during PutObject minio2 checking if `fs.json` exists)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
一旦获取到锁之后，minio2验证文件是否真的存在，以避免获得已被删除的fd的锁。但是这种情况与minio3存在竞争，因为minio3也在尝试写同一个文件。这就存在一种可能，`fs.json`已经被创建了，所以minio2获得的锁就无效，这样就可能会导致数据不一致。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
这是一种已知的问题，而且没办法通过POSIX fcntl锁来解决。这种情况是共享存储后端的限制，请你知晓。
|
