Seems like the reverse order relies on GNU specific getopt hackery which
musl does not replicate
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 41045
Simply scan for the most recent file in /etc and set
system time to this file modification time if it's in the future
It allow some time dependent program to work immediatly
without waiting for ntpd to sync
v1: v2: bad approach
v3: simply scan /etc, thanks to Bastian Bittorf for the idea
v4: use sort -n, thanks to Catalin Patulea
v5: use [] instead of [[]], thanks to Andreas Mohr
v6: use openwrt style, thanks to Bastian Bittorf
Signed-off-by: Etienne CHAMPETIER <etienne.champetier@free.fr>
SVN-Revision: 39422
Only reload hostname and timezone config on /etc/init.d/boot restart.
Module loading and basic boot setup is only done during boot.
Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
SVN-Revision: 38670
The behaviour of calling 'mount' differed depending on whether it called
the busybox-mount, the mount of util-linux, the mount defined in
/lib/functions.sh and /lib/functions/boot.sh
/etc/preinit even included /lib/functions.sh and /lib/functions/boot.sh,
both re-defining 'mount'.
SVN-Revision: 34792
Write "delay" and "message" options to their respective files,
allowing Morse code message configuration through UCI.
The delay (dit length) defaults to 150ms (about 8 words per minute,
suitable for beginners).
Signed-off-by: Petr Viktorin <encukou@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <juhosg@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 34380
Without this, /etc/init.d/led will try to set the non-existing 'rssi' trigger.
This doesn't harm as the kernel will refuse this setting, but it outputs some
ugly log-lines:
Jun 24 10:15:19 OpenWrt user.info sysinit: setting up led RSSILOW
Jun 24 10:15:19 OpenWrt user.info sysinit: sh: write error: Invalid argument
...
In order to avoid this, skip LEDs with trigger = "rssi" in /etc/init.d/led
Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <dgolle@allnet.de>
SVN-Revision: 33717
On slower devices wifi drivers might take too long for detecting
devices, resulting in the wifi detect call not seeing them.
This was observed on a bcm6348 with bcm4318 wifi. Adding a one second
pause was enough for b43 to expose the device.
SVN-Revision: 31639
hi
Another version, in this one the enable_server option is in the timeserver ntp part of the "system" config file
You can patch trunk and bacfire (tested both)
You can put busybox ntpd in client mode (if you put server), in client & server (by putting enable_server to 1, ntpd listen to udp 123), and also in server mode only (if you didn't put any servers in the config and still put enable_server 1, ntpd will answer with the time of the router)
I've replaced "config_foreach getpeers timeserver" with "config_get peers ntp server" because we want ntp timeserver, not random ones (to pre-answer if someone want to say that it's intrusive ...)
Signed-off-by: Etienne CHAMPETIER <etienne.champetier@free.fr>
Le 27/03/2012 20:41, Etienne Champetier a écrit :
> I've now tested my trunk patch and it works fine
> But I still can't find were $PROG is defined (is this a mistake, or some sort of built in variable???)
> (I've made some grep and nothing)
>
> Le 23/03/2012 02:19, Philip Prindeville a écrit :
>> Maybe:
>>
>> [ -n "$PROG" -a -x "$PROG" ] || return 1
>>
>> instead?
>>
>>
>> On 3/22/12 4:34 PM, Etienne Champetier wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> The 2 attached patchs (trunk & bacfire) add busybox ntpd enable_server option, as busybox ntpd server is compiled by default.
>>> We only need 1 client/server daemon (olipro patch was launching 2 daemons)
>>> I've fully tested the bacfire patch, and as i don't have a running openwrt trunk i'm not sure for the trunk patch (i'm sure about my modifications, but i'm not sure about "[ -x $PROG ] || return 1", as "$PROG" isn't defined ?!)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Etienne CHAMPETIER <etienne.champetier@free.fr>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 16/01/2012 01:57, Philip Prindeville a écrit :
>>>> On 1/14/12 11:37 AM, Olipro wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday 14 Jan 2012 02:45:59 Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>>>>> Don't we already have a 'disabled' option? Now we're adding an
>>>>>> 'enable_server' option?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That seems confusing for no useful reason.
>>>>>>
>>>>> have you bothered to read what I originally wrote? your response would make
>>>>> me inclined to believe that you didn't.
>>>>>
>>>>> currently the ntpd initscript only runs it as a CLIENT - this patch enables
>>>>> you to have one instance running as a client and another as a SERVER that
>>>>> other hosts can synchronise with.
>>>>>
>>>>> Or perhaps I'm misunderstanding, what would you propose for allowing the
>>>>> built-in busybox ntpd to be utilised as a server? a separate init script
>>>>> entirely perhaps?
>>>> Or separate config sections... instead of 'config ntp' have 'config ntp-server' and 'config ntp-client'.
>>>>
>>>> -Philip
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> openwrt-devel mailing list
>>>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
>>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>> _______________________________________________
>> openwrt-devel mailing list
>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
>> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
SVN-Revision: 31374
John Crispin