CPE ids helps to tracks CVE in packages.
https://cpe.mitre.org/specification/
Thanks to swalker for CPE to package mapping and
keep tracking CVEs.
Acked-by: Jo-Philipp Wich <jo@mein.io>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Couzens <lynxis@fe80.eu>
The libtool target package stages its files into the host staging directory
and moves the libltdl library parts from there into the target staging
directory afterwards.
By doing so, the package essentially renders the host libtool infrastructure
unusable, leading to the below error in subsequent package builds:
libtoolize: $pkgltdldir is not a directory: `.../hostpkg/share/libtool`
Prevent this problem by using a dedicated libltdl install prefix in order to
avoid overwriting and moving away preexisting files belonging to tools/libtool.
Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich <jo@mein.io>
Cleanup to prepare for changing STAGING_DIR_HOSTPKG. The actual change of
STAGING_DIR_HOSTPKG (i.e., moving the host packages back into a common, not
target-specific directory) will be done after the first LEDE release, but
the cleanup will also be useful for projects like Gluon.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@universe-factory.net>
Switch to xz tarball, there's no point pulling two different tarballs of the same source code (tools/libtool uses xz).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Engberg <daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net>
Source package libtool is used to package libltdl.
Unfortunately binary libtoolize is missing.
Packaging libtoolize would depend on package file which is in the
packages feed.
Felix Fietkau suggested to rename source libtool to libltdl
and to create a new package libtool in packages.
This patch contains the renaming.
CC: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
SVN-Revision: 48149
Note, that licensing stuff is a nightmare: many packages does not clearly
state their licenses, and often multiple source files are simply copied
together - each with different licensing information in the file headers.
I tried hard to ensure, that the license information extracted into the OpenWRT's
makefiles fit the "spirit" of the packages, e.g. such small packages which
come without a dedicated source archive "inherites" the OpenWRT's own license
in my opinion.
However, I can not garantee that I always picked the correct information
and/or did not miss license information.
Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold <mhei@heimpold.de>
SVN-Revision: 43155
Jo-Philipp Wich