These instructions are for 64-bit load/store. On ARMv5TE, the CPU requires addresses to be aligned to 64-bit. When misaligned, behavior is undefined (effectively either loads the same word twice on LDRD, or corrupts surrounding memory on STRD). On ARMv6 and newer, unaligned access is safe. Removing these instructions for ARMv5TE is necessary, because GCC ignores alignment information in pointers and does unsafe optimizations that have shown up as bugs in various places. Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org> SVN-Revision: 39638master
parent
f433088d50
commit
b050f87d13
@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ |
||||
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.h
|
||||
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.h
|
||||
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ extern void (*arm_lang_output_object_att
|
||||
#define TARGET_BACKTRACE (leaf_function_p () \
|
||||
? TARGET_TPCS_LEAF_FRAME \
|
||||
: TARGET_TPCS_FRAME)
|
||||
-#define TARGET_LDRD (arm_arch5e && ARM_DOUBLEWORD_ALIGN)
|
||||
+#define TARGET_LDRD (arm_arch6 && ARM_DOUBLEWORD_ALIGN)
|
||||
#define TARGET_AAPCS_BASED \
|
||||
(arm_abi != ARM_ABI_APCS && arm_abi != ARM_ABI_ATPCS)
|
||||
|
@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ |
||||
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.h
|
||||
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.h
|
||||
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ extern void (*arm_lang_output_object_att
|
||||
/* Thumb-1 only. */
|
||||
#define TARGET_THUMB1_ONLY (TARGET_THUMB1 && !arm_arch_notm)
|
||||
|
||||
-#define TARGET_LDRD (arm_arch5e && ARM_DOUBLEWORD_ALIGN \
|
||||
+#define TARGET_LDRD (arm_arch6 && ARM_DOUBLEWORD_ALIGN \
|
||||
&& !TARGET_THUMB1)
|
||||
|
||||
/* The following two macros concern the ability to execute coprocessor
|
@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ |
||||
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.h
|
||||
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.h
|
||||
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ extern void (*arm_lang_output_object_att
|
||||
/* Thumb-1 only. */
|
||||
#define TARGET_THUMB1_ONLY (TARGET_THUMB1 && !arm_arch_notm)
|
||||
|
||||
-#define TARGET_LDRD (arm_arch5e && ARM_DOUBLEWORD_ALIGN \
|
||||
+#define TARGET_LDRD (arm_arch6 && ARM_DOUBLEWORD_ALIGN \
|
||||
&& !TARGET_THUMB1)
|
||||
|
||||
/* The following two macros concern the ability to execute coprocessor
|
Loading…
Reference in new issue