From 0fed0806df48a0df17de328ecbca46e03b1d49d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Felix Fietkau Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 01:48:29 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] uClibc: 0.9.32 needs the ldso fix as well SVN-Revision: 24074 --- ...fix-__dl_parse_dynamic_info-segfault.patch | 41 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) create mode 100644 toolchain/uClibc/patches-0.9.32/130-ldso-fix-__dl_parse_dynamic_info-segfault.patch diff --git a/toolchain/uClibc/patches-0.9.32/130-ldso-fix-__dl_parse_dynamic_info-segfault.patch b/toolchain/uClibc/patches-0.9.32/130-ldso-fix-__dl_parse_dynamic_info-segfault.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..d523d1b0c4 --- /dev/null +++ b/toolchain/uClibc/patches-0.9.32/130-ldso-fix-__dl_parse_dynamic_info-segfault.patch @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +[PATCH] ld.so: ldd crashes when __LDSO_SEARCH_INTERP_PATH__ is not #defined +Since b65c7b2c79debcb9017e31913e01eeaa280106fb, the implicit search path +can be disabled by not #defining __LDSO_SEARCH_INTERP_PATH__. This +causes _dl_ldsopath to never be set, so it remains NULL. _dl_ldsopath is +still used when __LDSO_LDD_SUPPORT__ is #defined, to strip the path off +of the beginning of the absolute path to the ld.so interpreter in use +for printing. The _dl_strlen will crash with a NULL argument. + +Rather than relying on _dl_ldsopath, this change causes ldd to compute +the interpreter's basename directly. + +glibc ld.so seems to print the full path to the interpreter without +any computed basename or =>. I personally prefer glibc's behavior, but +to preserve backwards compatibility with uClibc ld.so, the existing +format with the computed basename, =>, and full path is used here. This +enables simpler (and unchanged) text processing in a pipeline. + +Signed-off-by: Mark Mentovai +--- +ldso/ldso/ldso.c | 12 +++++++++--- +--- a/ldso/ldso/ldso.c ++++ b/ldso/ldso/ldso.c +@@ -920,9 +920,15 @@ + #ifdef __LDSO_LDD_SUPPORT__ + /* End of the line for ldd.... */ + if (trace_loaded_objects) { +- _dl_dprintf(1, "\t%s => %s (%x)\n", +- rpnt->dyn->libname + _dl_strlen(_dl_ldsopath) + 1, +- rpnt->dyn->libname, DL_LOADADDR_BASE(rpnt->dyn->loadaddr)); ++ /* glibc ld.so/ldd would just do ++ * _dl_dprintf(1, "\t%s (%x)\n", rpnt->dyn->libname, ++ * DL_LOADADDR_BASE(rpnt->dyn->loadaddr)); ++ * but uClibc has always used the => format. */ ++ char *ptmp = _dl_strrchr(rpnt->dyn->libname, '/'); ++ if (ptmp != rpnt->dyn->libname) ++ ++ptmp; ++ _dl_dprintf(1, "\t%s => %s (%x)\n", ptmp, rpnt->dyn->libname, ++ DL_LOADADDR_BASE(rpnt->dyn->loadaddr)); + _dl_exit(0); + } + #endif